SayPro Classified

SayProApp Machines Services Jobs Courses Sponsor Donate Study Fundraise Training NPO Development Events Classified Forum Staff Shop Arts Biodiversity Sports Agri Tech Support Logistics Travel Government Classified Charity Corporate Investor School Accountants Career Health TV Client World Southern Africa Market Professionals Online Farm Academy Consulting Cooperative Group Holding Hosting MBA Network Construction Rehab Clinic Hospital Partner Community Security Research Pharmacy College University HighSchool PrimarySchool PreSchool Library STEM Laboratory Incubation NPOAfrica Crowdfunding Tourism Chemistry Investigations Cleaning Catering Knowledge Accommodation Geography Internships Camps BusinessSchool

SayPro Monthly January SCMR-5 Testing Report Template

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button 👇

Written by

Likhapha Mpepe

in

SayPro Monthly January SCMR-5 SayPro Monthly Monthly Classified Map Integration: Integrate maps to display ad locations visually by SayPro Classified Office under SayPro Marketing Royalty SCMR

Report Overview

  • Title: SayPro Monthly January SCMR-5 Testing Report
  • Project: SayPro Monthly Classified Map Integration
  • Version: SCMR-5
  • Report Date: [Insert Date of Testing]
  • Report Created by: [Insert Name]
  • Report Reviewed by: [Insert Name]
  • Test Period: [Insert Start Date] to [Insert End Date]
  • Document Number: SCMR-5-TestReport-2025-01

1. Objective

  • Purpose of Testing:
    This report documents the testing results and performance analysis for the integration of the classified map display in the SayPro Classified system under SayPro Marketing Royalty SCMR.
  • Scope:
    The scope of this test includes evaluating the functionality, usability, and performance of the map integration for displaying ad locations visually on multiple devices (desktop, mobile, tablet).
  • Testing Environment:
    • Device Types: Desktop, Mobile (Android, iOS), Tablet (Android, iOS)
    • Browsers Tested: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
    • Operating Systems: Windows, macOS, Android, iOS
    • Internet Speed: [Tested Speed: Example: 100 Mbps]

2. Test Summary

  • Test Type(s):
    • Functional Testing
    • Cross-Browser Compatibility Testing
    • Mobile Responsiveness Testing
    • Performance Testing
    • User Interface (UI) Testing
  • Test Objectives:
    • Validate correct ad location markers on the map.
    • Check performance metrics (load time, responsiveness).
    • Ensure the map displays properly on various device sizes.
    • Verify that map interaction (zooming, panning, etc.) works smoothly across devices.

3. Test Results

3.1. Functional Testing
  • Test Case 1: Map Display
    • Description: Check if the map integrates correctly with classified ad locations.
    • Expected Result: Map should display ad location pins on the correct geographical locations.
    • Actual Result: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Include any relevant details, like accuracy of ad locations or any discrepancies found].
  • Test Case 2: Map Interaction (Zoom/Pan)
    • Description: Ensure users can zoom in/out and pan on the map without issues.
    • Expected Result: Smooth zooming and panning functionality.
    • Actual Result: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Any performance issues, errors, or additional observations].
3.2. Cross-Browser Compatibility Testing
  • Test Case 1: Map Loading Across Browsers
    • Browsers Tested: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
    • Expected Result: Map should load and function identically across all tested browsers.
    • Actual Result:
      • Chrome: [Pass/Fail]
      • Firefox: [Pass/Fail]
      • Safari: [Pass/Fail]
      • Edge: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Mention any rendering issues, browser-specific bugs, or performance delays].
3.3. Mobile Responsiveness Testing
  • Test Case 1: Map Display on Mobile Devices
    • Description: Ensure that the map adjusts correctly to various mobile screen sizes.
    • Devices Tested: iPhone, Android phone, iPad, Android tablet
    • Expected Result: Map should be fully responsive and display correctly on all mobile devices.
    • Actual Result:
      • iPhone: [Pass/Fail]
      • Android Phone: [Pass/Fail]
      • iPad: [Pass/Fail]
      • Android Tablet: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Any issues with device-specific scaling, resolution, or loading times].
3.4. Performance Testing
  • Test Case 1: Map Load Time
    • Description: Check the time taken for the map to load and render ad locations.
    • Expected Result: Map should load in less than [Insert Desired Time, e.g., 5 seconds].
    • Actual Result: [Insert Actual Load Time]
    • Comments: [Mention any delays or performance degradation].
  • Test Case 2: Interaction Responsiveness
    • Description: Verify smooth map interaction (zoom/pan) without lag or freeze.
    • Expected Result: Interaction should be responsive and lag-free.
    • Actual Result: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Provide insights on lag or freezing observed during testing].
3.5. User Interface Testing
  • Test Case 1: Marker Visibility and Legibility
    • Description: Ensure that the markers on the map are clearly visible and easy to read.
    • Expected Result: Markers should be prominent, and ad details should be easily readable.
    • Actual Result: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [If any markers were hard to read, mention it].
  • Test Case 2: Map Controls Accessibility
    • Description: Ensure map controls (zoom, full screen, etc.) are accessible and functional.
    • Expected Result: Controls should be intuitive and easy to use.
    • Actual Result: [Pass/Fail]
    • Comments: [Any issues with accessibility or UI layout].

4. Defects and Issues

  • Summary of Issues Identified:
    • [List all defects, issues, or bugs found during testing, along with their severity].
  • Severity Levels:
    • Critical: System-wide failure that halts functionality.
    • Major: A significant issue that affects a major part of the system.
    • Minor: A small issue that doesn’t hinder the overall experience but requires attention.
  • Issues Summary:
    • [Issue 1: Description, Severity Level]
    • [Issue 2: Description, Severity Level]
    • [Issue 3: Description, Severity Level]

5. Recommendations

  • Performance Improvements:
    Suggest optimizations for faster load times and smoother interactions across devices.
  • Cross-Browser Enhancements:
    Recommend any changes to improve compatibility across specific browsers.
  • UI/UX Improvements:
    Provide insights on enhancing the user interface for better navigation and ease of use.

6. Conclusion

  • Test Summary:
    [Summarize the overall success or failure of the integration based on the test cases. Highlight the key findings and their impact on the user experience].
  • Next Steps:
    • [Outline the next steps, such as bug fixes, re-testing, deployment plans, etc.].

7. Appendices (Optional)

  • Appendix A: Screenshots and Visuals
    [Include relevant screenshots of the map integration on different devices, showing bugs or successful integrations].
  • Appendix B: Test Logs
    [Include any detailed test logs that support the findings].

This SayPro Monthly January SCMR-5 Testing Report Template will help document the testing results for the SayPro Classified Map Integration and ensure that the map displays properly across various devices and meets performance standards. Adjust the content based on the actual testing results.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts

error: Content is protected !!