SayPro Monthly January SCMR-5 SayPro Monthly Monthly Classified Image Optimization: Compress and optimize images for better performance by SayPro Classified Office under SayPro Marketing Royalty SCMR
Purpose: To document the results of image performance tests, including load times and visual quality, as part of SayPro’s Monthly Classified Image Optimization efforts under the SayPro Marketing Royalty SCMR, specifically focusing on the optimization and compression of images to enhance website performance.
Performance Test Results Template
Project Name: SayPro Monthly Classified Image Optimization
Date of Test: [Enter the Date of Test]
Test Performed By: [Tester’s Name]
Report Generated By: [Name of Report Generator]
Test Period: January SCMR-5 (Monthly Review Period)
1. Image Optimization Summary
| Image Name | File Size (Before) | File Size (After Compression) | Compression Percentage (%) | File Format (Before) | File Format (After) | Resolution (Before) | Resolution (After) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Image 1 Name] | [Before Size] (KB/MB) | [After Size] (KB/MB) | [Percentage] | [JPG/PNG] | [JPG/PNG] | [Width x Height] | [Width x Height] |
| [Image 2 Name] | [Before Size] (KB/MB) | [After Size] (KB/MB) | [Percentage] | [JPG/PNG] | [JPG/PNG] | [Width x Height] | [Width x Height] |
| [Image 3 Name] | [Before Size] (KB/MB) | [After Size] (KB/MB) | [Percentage] | [JPG/PNG] | [JPG/PNG] | [Width x Height] | [Width x Height] |
Notes:
- Include any significant findings related to specific image types (e.g., logo images, background images) or categories (e.g., classified ads images).
- For compression percentage, indicate the overall savings and any noticeable impact on quality.
2. Load Time Performance Results
| Page Name | Tested Image(s) | Page Load Time Before Optimization (seconds) | Page Load Time After Optimization (seconds) | Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Page 1 Name] | [Image 1, Image 2, etc.] | [Before Load Time] | [After Load Time] | [Improvement %] |
| [Page 2 Name] | [Image 1, Image 3, etc.] | [Before Load Time] | [After Load Time] | [Improvement %] |
| [Page 3 Name] | [Image 2, Image 3, etc.] | [Before Load Time] | [After Load Time] | [Improvement %] |
Notes:
- Highlight any pages that showed significant improvement in load times after image compression.
- Mention any instances where optimization did not result in expected load time improvement.
3. Visual Quality Assessment
| Image Name | Visual Quality Before Optimization | Visual Quality After Optimization | Change in Quality (Scale 1-5) | Comments on Visual Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Image 1 Name] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [1-5 Scale] | [Explanation or issues noted] |
| [Image 2 Name] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [1-5 Scale] | [Explanation or issues noted] |
| [Image 3 Name] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [Good/Fair/Poor] | [1-5 Scale] | [Explanation or issues noted] |
Notes:
- Visual quality should be assessed based on criteria such as image clarity, sharpness, and noticeable artifacts (e.g., blurriness, pixelation).
- Provide feedback on any images where quality degradation was significant or minimal after optimization.
4. SEO Impact (if applicable)
| Image Name | Alt Text Before Optimization | Alt Text After Optimization | SEO Rating Before Optimization | SEO Rating After Optimization | Change in SEO Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Image 1 Name] | [Alt Text Before] | [Alt Text After] | [Before Score] | [After Score] | [Percentage] |
| [Image 2 Name] | [Alt Text Before] | [Alt Text After] | [Before Score] | [After Score] | [Percentage] |
Notes:
- Include details about any changes to alt text, file names, or any impact on SEO due to optimization.
- SEO ratings can be sourced from tools like Google Lighthouse or other SEO tools.
5. Overall Performance Summary
| Key Metric | Before Optimization | After Optimization | Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total File Size | [Before Total Size] | [After Total Size] | [Improvement %] |
| Average Load Time | [Before Time] | [After Time] | [Improvement %] |
| Visual Quality | [Before Quality] | [After Quality] | [Improvement %] |
Final Summary:
- Provide an overall assessment of the success of the image optimization efforts.
- Mention any areas that still need improvement or specific image types that posed challenges during optimization.
- Offer recommendations for future optimization cycles, if applicable.
6. Recommendations for Future Optimization
- [List any specific recommendations for improving image performance in the next optimization cycle.]
- [Examples: Consider reducing image resolutions further, exploring alternative compression techniques, etc.]
End of Report
Report Reviewed By: [Reviewer’s Name]
Next Steps: [Actionable tasks based on the results, such as further optimization or testing additional tools.]
This template should provide a comprehensive overview of the image optimization process, documenting key metrics and allowing for continuous improvement in the SayPro Monthly Classified Image Optimization initiative.
Leave a Reply